Closer to Truth > How Does Basic Science Defend America?
I love this show. Luckily Howard University Television (WHUT, Channel
32 in DC) actually carries this. The show is a panel discussion with
experts from different fields with different points of view.
While supporting basic science research is indeed essential for
protecting national security, can that be our sole primary
motivation for pursuing knowledge of the natural world? When asked
by Congress whether Fermilab, the expensive atomic accelerator,
would contribute to the national defense, its founding director
replied that the contribution would be "... not to the defense of
the nation, but rather to what made the nation worth defending."
This session is very timely -- for NASA and EPA, too. In government,
it seems that they're really pulling away from having scientists on
the payroll (not as contractors) who do basic research that may not
have an immediate practical use.
Sean Carroll, a Physicist at the University of Chicago, recently
No comments:
Post a Comment