Texas Education Agency director of science curriculum fired for announcing
Barbara Forrest talk
Chris Comer, the director of science curriculum for the Texas
Education Agency, was forced to resign from her position. Her offense?
Forwarding an email from the National Center for Science Education
announcing a talk by philosopher and intelligent design critic Barbara
Forrest, and adding the text "FYI."
The call to fire Comer came from Lizzette Reynolds, formerly at the
U.S. Department of Education and former deputy legislative director
for Texas Gov. George W. Bush. She wrote in an email to Comer's
supervisors that "This is highly inappropriate. I believe this is an
offense that calls for termination or, at the very least, reassignment
of responsibilities."
The movie "Expelled" makes a big deal about cases like the Sternberg
affair, where nobody lost a job or responsibilities, and the denial of
tenure to Guillermo Gonzales, whose publication record didn't merit
tenure. But here's a case of someone who appears to have actually been
removed from her position for sending out an announcement of a talk
critical of intelligent design--a subject which the courts have
already ruled is unconstitutional to teach in the science classroom.
TEA officials claim that Comer was removed for "repeated acts of
misconduct and insubordination," which Comer describes as really
meaning her concerns about teaching creationism in schools. The Texas
Republican Party platform explicitly advocates teaching intelligent
design in public schools.
Wesley Elsberry has more about the Comer case at the Austringer blog,
where he wonders whether the Discovery Institute will decry Comer's
firing, since they've been willing to stretch the facts to complain
about cases with far less substance to them:
Will the Discovery Institute come forward to say that the TEA is
repressing Ms. Comer's free speech rights? Will they urge her to
become the star of the "Expelled" movie? After all, she did
actually lose her job over her stance on evolution in education, as
opposed to various people noted as being featured in the film who
did not. But the DI is unlikely to do so because Ms. Comer is on
the opposite side of the issue from them. They aren't defending a
principle, they are pushing a particular line of propaganda.
I agree with Wesley. The Discovery Institute has a long record of
misrepresenting facts (and not just about science) in order to promote
its views. I suspect they will either remain silent or try to defend
Comer's removal.
Pharyngula also comments on Comer's removal, including the following
explanation from Comer's boss:
the forwarding of this event announcement by Ms. Comer, as the
Director of Science, from her TEA email account constitutes much
more than just sharing information. Ms. Comer's email implies
endorsement of the speaker and implies that TEA endorses the
speaker's position on a subject on which the agency must remain
neutral. Thus, sending this email compromises the agency's role in
the TEKS revision process by creating the perception that TEA has a
biased position on a subject directly related to the science
education TEKS.
As P.Z. Myers comments: "Whoa. The Texas Education Agency is neutral
on the subject of teaching good science? It's bad if the TEA takes a
position on the subject of science education? Apparently, TEA members
are supposed to close their eyes and maximize ignorance before making
decisions. I really feel sorry for Texas."
UPDATE (December 2, 2007): And more, from Texas Citizens for Science
(via Pharyngula).
UPDATE (December 4, 2007): The New York Times editorializes on this
subject.
UPDATE (December 6, 2007): DI Fellow John Mark Reynolds agrees that
TEA is in the wrong here.
UPDATE (December 12, 2007): The Society for the Study of Evolution has
sent an open letter to "Texas TEA."
UPDATE (December 20, 2007): Glenn Branch has written a nice blog post
about his email that cost Comer her job.
Posted by Jim Lippard at 11/29/2007 08:01:00 AM
No comments:
Post a Comment