Thursday, 14 February 2008

top science stories of 2007 where are



Scientific American editors and reporters have decided upon published

their top 25 science stories of the year. During the last couple of

weeks in December, most publications (offline and online) always

publish articles about the top stories in any subject; a science

publication is no different. Regardless, I was surprised to see that

out of 25 stories, the Scientific American editors only included one

robot related. The story selected had to do with an effort to test a

remote-controlled robot designed for underground mine rescue

operations. The location for the tests was the collapsed Crandall

Canyon Utah mine which had cost the lives of six mine and three rescue

workers. Rescuers earned some valuable experience using a robot in a

mine rescue operation and there is hope that this will translate to

better rescue robots in the near future.

The rescue robot story was interesting and likely worth a mention. I

was surprised, however, that the Urban Challenge robots did not

register in SciAm's radar. These robot car autonomously navigated for

hours city-like streets obeying the laws of traffic and sharing the

road with other vehicles some driven by humans. The Urban Challenge

was conquered easily after the first attempt compared to the Grand

Challenge that required two takes before any cars could finish the

course.

Other than the robots of the Urban Challenge, I think the bomb

disposal robots currently used in the Middle East are also worth a

mention. These are robots that are saving lives; and this is a fact

that cannot be disputed whether one is pro or against the war. The

rather bad news are that the military is slowly funding research to

make these into weapon carrying machines capable of killing people; it

is basically inevitable that autonomous robot soldiers will at some

point become a major part of the armed forces of those countries that

can afford to have them. Sad, but true!

Read: Top 25 Science Stories of 2007 on SciAm.com.


No comments: