Thursday, 14 February 2008

public relations and science



Public relations and science

The latest issue of Seed has an excellent quote form Lawrence Krauss,

a theoretical physicist at Case Western Reserve University:

I remember, I was on a visiting committee at MIT, and these

students tend to think they're going to be successful because

they're good at what they're doing. But in fact, a large barometer

of their success will be how well they can communicate what they're

doing. Not just to the outside public, which most scientists don't

necessarily have to do -- though I think that's important, too --

but within the field, or to your company. It isn't just what you

do, it's often how you present it. And, traditionally, we've spent

very little time educating our students on how to communicate.

I absolutely agree. This could be dismissed as "spinning," something

which scientists shouldn't do. But the truth is thousands of

scientific papers are published every month. Nobody has time to read

them all, and most of the papers one does read can't be read

carefully. If the writer doesn't do a good job of explaining what the

results mean and why they are important, they are likely to be missed.

If you are giving a talk about your research, hopefully the audience

can figure out for themselves why your information is relevant to

their work, but you're doing everybody a favor if you help them. Many

very good researchers are terrible at communicating their ideas and

their findings.

Many people are aware that Mendel's groundbreaking studies of heredity

were buried and what he learned had to be re-discovered independently.

According to Frank Sulloway in Born to Rebel, this was partly due to

Mendel's inability to communicate the importance of his findings.

Just in case anybody thinks Krauss is advocating spin:

So strategies of persuasion, I think, are vitally important within

the field. But -- and I should be very clear about this -- while I

understand science as a sociological phenomena, I do believe in

objective reality and I do believe that, ultimately, important

science wins out in spite of the social constructs adn the social

or peer pressures to do certain things...That's what makes science

special.


No comments: