The Sweet Science?
The Journal of Law and Policy at Brooklyn Law School has an
interesting student note by Joshua A. Stein, Hitting Below the Belt:
Florida's Taxation of Pay-Per-Pay Boxing Programming is a
Content-Based Violation of the First Amendment. Stein concludes that:
Florida is one of numerous states to authorize a tax specific to
telecasts of boxing. As these taxes are specific to a type of
television programming, they should be held by courts to be
content-based restrictions on speech. However, boxing and other
sports have been denied the protections of the First Amendment
because they are deemed to be non-expressive. An historical and
literary analysis of boxing demonstrates that the sport satisfies
the Spence test because boxers intend to express particularized
messages which are understood by their audiences. When strict
scrutiny is applied to taxes on boxing telecasts, the state's
interest in raising revenue is outweighed by boxers'--and their
promoters'--freedom of expression.
Stein quotes Norman Mailer at length in an attempt to show that
"[a]lthough the expression inherent in boxing cannot be neatly
categorized, it is expressive conduct that conveys a specific message
that has a substantial likelihood of being understood nonetheless."
Somehow, I can't buy the argument the two guys beating their brains
out is an exemplar of "expressive conduct." However, I am sensitive to
the argument that (i) there's a potential slipperly slope here and
(ii) the power to tax is the power to destroy. For instance, if the
state can tax boxing while exempting other sorts of content, what's to
stop it from imposing a tax that is so high that it would, in effect,
ban any show with any erotic material (however loosely defined) from
the cable-ways.
Ultimately, of course, the state's efforts in this regard will fail.
As I noted earlier, once the internet pipes get big enough, the
broadcasters of internet content will be beyond the reach of state
sales tax assessors. Anyone who doesn't think that boxing matches
can't be moved offshore simply does not remember "The Thriller In
Manilla"
No comments:
Post a Comment